{
  "acceptanceCriteria": [
    "Exactly three distinct subject lines are delivered.",
    "Preview text is 30-160 characters.",
    "The body stays inside the selected length range.",
    "The approved topic is clear in the opening paragraph.",
    "Every internal fact snapshot exactly matches its cited source evidence.",
    "Writing choices cite the best available voice evidence: two decisions when at least two sources exist, otherwise one.",
    "The output labels whether its voice basis is newsletter samples, website language, or facts only.",
    "Every claimed signature phrase appears verbatim in an allowed voice source.",
    "The CTA gives the reader one clear next action.",
    "No customer story, quote, number, offer, deadline, personal experience, or URL is invented.",
    "The draft avoids generic AI scaffolding without adding random slang or fake imperfections.",
    "The final newsletter is reviewed once and saved as newsletter.md."
  ],
  "manualReview": [
    "Would someone familiar with the source newsletters recognize the voice?",
    "Does the confidence label honestly reflect the evidence available?",
    "Does the email say something specific to this company?",
    "Would the body still work unchanged for an unrelated company?",
    "Are the subject lines meaningfully different instead of paraphrases?",
    "Does the CTA match the email's actual purpose?",
    "Did the review preserve every supported fact and link?"
  ]
}